<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emergency Social-Repeater System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/</link>
	<description>disambiguating the eponymous</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlogSchmog &#187; Emergency 2.0</title>
		<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogSchmog &#187; Emergency 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>[...] thus Twitter as an emergency channel entered my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thus Twitter as an emergency channel entered my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily EM : &#8230;random notes on technology, media, and society</title>
		<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily EM : &#8230;random notes on technology, media, and society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>[...] eponymousX » Blog Archive » Emergency Social-Repeater System Microcrowds overlap and each have “pack leaders” or “social seeds” with deep downstream social connections in the form of followers or friends. The leaders in these groups are generally highly connected through the use of communication hardware (tags: emergency microcrowds twitter messaging) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eponymousX » Blog Archive » Emergency Social-Repeater System Microcrowds overlap and each have “pack leaders” or “social seeds” with deep downstream social connections in the form of followers or friends. The leaders in these groups are generally highly connected through the use of communication hardware (tags: emergency microcrowds twitter messaging) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Synergy &#187; Giving: Ad-hoc safety nets, and collective trust-network problem solving</title>
		<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Synergy &#187; Giving: Ad-hoc safety nets, and collective trust-network problem solving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>[...] design them to serve our human needs in the most vital times. It’s ideas like Brian Caldwell’s Emergency Social-Repeater System or the recent thread on the coworking mailing list for P2P health care that suggest that we’re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] design them to serve our human needs in the most vital times. It’s ideas like Brian Caldwell’s Emergency Social-Repeater System or the recent thread on the coworking mailing list for P2P health care that suggest that we’re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymousX</title>
		<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymousX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>That's true Bryce, IF we rely only on Twitter. For simplicity sake I named only one system, but in fact the "massive redundancy" I reference involves ALL social networking. So the repeater system is really software platform independent in that sense. Just as it's person independent. I personally might fail to notice a plane crash right away, or maybe I'm offline for a day and miss an inbound message about an anthrax spill, but if the message hits many "pack leaders" the message will still get through. It's just like TCP/IP routing in that sense. One failure does not take the system down. Hardware, software or wetware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true Bryce, IF we rely only on Twitter. For simplicity sake I named only one system, but in fact the &#8220;massive redundancy&#8221; I reference involves ALL social networking. So the repeater system is really software platform independent in that sense. Just as it&#8217;s person independent. I personally might fail to notice a plane crash right away, or maybe I&#8217;m offline for a day and miss an inbound message about an anthrax spill, but if the message hits many &#8220;pack leaders&#8221; the message will still get through. It&#8217;s just like TCP/IP routing in that sense. One failure does not take the system down. Hardware, software or wetware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Moore</title>
		<link>http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eponymousx.com/blog/2007/08/26/mashups/emergency-social-repeater-system/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea.  My only real concern, though, is that the medium of deployment (e.g. Twitter) is just as redundant (read: not at all) as conventional notification systems such as phones, televisions, and radio stations.  One unfortunate earthquake near the Valley wipes out 90% of Web 2.0.

If we can build redundancy and predictability into the process, then we definitely have an interesting idea to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea.  My only real concern, though, is that the medium of deployment (e.g. Twitter) is just as redundant (read: not at all) as conventional notification systems such as phones, televisions, and radio stations.  One unfortunate earthquake near the Valley wipes out 90% of Web 2.0.</p>
<p>If we can build redundancy and predictability into the process, then we definitely have an interesting idea to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
